RESPECTFULLY, I ask forgiveness from this soldier and from Lt. Gen. Ali Kuli Khan. The soldier has requested the assistance of Gen. Ali Kuli to bring the attention of the COAS Gen. Asim Munir to his compiled questions. The time for asking questions have passed even if one would see authenticity in matters floating on the social media.
Humbly, I am responding because I have just assumed the Honorary rank of the Chief of the Army Staff (COAS). Assuming the rank would be definitely an act of narcissism or my being idiotic if I was a soldier of some rank placing myself into a higher order. Without such inhibitions and my not being a soldier requires your approval to clear me of any embarrassment or an abnormality under the circumstances. There is a purpose.
Dear soldier:
I hope you are ever attempting to hold strong and belong in togetherness.
You are worried of not receiving an authentic answer to your questions from Gen. Munir may culminate into “rising speculation, confusion and demoralization.” As of today, I as a self-proclaimed Honorary COAS compared to the disappointing one out there, I stand as an honorary soldier before you an authentic source.
May I correct your delusional premise Sir. Your premise has assumed Gen. Asim to be a man of sincerity and you pinning your hopes onto him. My assessment of your premise is evident from your statement that places him on higher ground by means of, “Some of the officers want to reach Gen[.] Asim in order to get answers to questions which bother them […] their letter won’t get to him.”
Your premise will turn illogical if it would no longer hold true. A torn apart country by his predecessor would have behooved an upright man to face the nation, and say something. What Gen. Asim did? He cowardly stood in hiding behind his men. His other actions, instead of sacking Lt. Gen. Iftikhar for participating in crimes against humanity, what Gen. Asim does? Hands Lt. Gen. Iftikhar the Southern command.
If your premise is deemed faulty by now, what good would it do sending your questions “to Gen Shuaib, and Gen. Ali.” You have come up with your hope before these two gentlemen to place your questions on the desk of Gen. Munir, defies the ground reality.
The new reality is. The serving and the retired men are now two disconnected and disjointed outfits. The former is loyal to country and the latter have turned—Bajwa a pimp and Gen. Asim—you got the relationship.
Gen. Asim cannot give you sincere answers. He was a party to the alleged treachery from Bajwa days. I will show Gen. Asim is further from your hope, which will never become a reality. Your indulgence in your reality has assumed he to be a man of honor and sincere to country.
Kindly understand a soldier’s restraint. Any rank lower than a three star in the Pakistan Army cannot think to indulge into making plans of self-preservation unless he/she is stranded on an island. Stranded? That is not the case here—your self-preservation is looking up to a structure. Hence, your request.
If the two generals you have asked for help do not join, which they cannot, you are helpless. Unless you pour your faith into me, believing that I am your four star leader and a mentor, you would have difficulty buying into my war plan. A soldier by design cannot follow a civilian’s strategy. If you have bought into my premise, by now you should be demoralized beyond listening to the sound bites of your on the ground COAS.
If the answers to the questions you have asked “are pretty well known,” asking those again fall short of asking another essential question, “How do you get your country back?” The reality of your country’s freedom does not begin with your questions. To bring you clarity I answer those for you.
Your Questions
- How will you Gen. Asim rehabilitate the image of the army?
Answer
I as Honorary COAS would have arrested Bajwa and the Joint Criminal Enterprise. Think! Bajwa and the Chief Justice have committed acts of sedition and treason. There is circumstantial evidence enough for a grand jury to indict them. Gen. Asim Munir failed to act in truthfulness and in duty to his profession and country even prior to he becoming the army chief.
2. Was there an army hand behind the assassination attempt on Imran Khan and the murder of Arshad Sharif?
Answer
As your Honorary COAS, my guidance is; let’s assume, the Joint Enterprise is involved in solicitation of murder: A murder has not taken place yet. In the case of Bajwa and his posse, it is more of a Joint Enterprise murder. Everyone that participates in executing the plan is liable regardless of who physically carried out the actus reus. Actus reus is the physical act.
Bajwa brought these men of crime, he has not only participated, but Bjawa was and is the ring leader. The buck stops with him.
3. Is Army High Command (AHC) behind the treatment of Azam Swati?
Answer
Any miscellaneous acts and damages arising from the first action (treason and sedition) makes them liable. Duty to country and profession is missing.
The Carnegie endowment’s Sara Chayes has studied criminal governments. Chayes’s research is a textbook case for Pakistan’s Joint Criminal Enterprise. First, “When government becomes a criminal enterprise, its judiciary ensures impunity. They repurpose state functions to maximizing money, and that means the judiciary. [Second] […] Petty corruption on the street makes it all the way to the Interior Minister. [Third, from] humiliation victims suffer.” Chayes research identifies with the human rights violations taking place in Pakistan.
4. What is the Army role of in procuring clean chits (pardoning them of crimes) for every major thief of the count
Answer
AHC is on record; no one can leave the country without their consent.
5. Has Bajwa by promoting his men of his loyalty restricted Gen. Asim Munir (tied his hands to act.)?
Answer
The masses believing into this premise buys Gen. Asim time. As a strategy it favors the status quo. These are stratagems to delay elections and to extend people’s hope. As your Honorary COAS, I have options to overcome such obstacles rather quickly.
6. Is there a mechanism in place to monitor economic warfare against State?
Answer
Yes, there is. It is the army and ISI. Army is in a compromised state. The army is no longer a muktadar (honorable) institution.
7. Why Bajwa rewarded the “scoundrel(s)” with “promotion”?
Answer
Marriage between Treachery and Reward.
8. Is the army aware that an economic war against the country involves the hollowing out of the treasury of the country by its own elites who have the power to do so?
Answer
A Chief with honor would have reversed faulty actions and would not have prolonged the catastrophe upon a country to meet her next fatal attraction. Army is compromised.
9. Is the army aware of the fact that we are near default, and what will be its implications for the country?
Answer
Yes, the sequence of the next fatal attraction has to play. The Army is compromised at the brigade level.
10. So what is the position of the AHC on Bajwa’s assets?
Answer
A COAS true to country and his profession would freeze assets till further investigations. Gen. Hamid Gul told me in 2014 that Pakistan army was corrupt, and just not the Generals.
11. What is the army’s determination that a regime change was brought by the foreign power?
Answer
It is the COAS’ duty to save the government regardless of the instigators.
End of a soldier’s questions
THE NEW PREMISE IS, Asim and Bajwa are Reactionaries
- Bajwa thinks he has attempted a revolution. It is not a revolution because he lacks sagacity. People are not with him. Only a delusional power.
- They are reactionaries and not revolutionaries. ‘They have carried violence to a point where they are hated, despotism to where they are distrusted, and the abuse of their legislative power up to disloyalty.’
Source: Pierre Joseph Proudhon Achieve. Original Source: Written: 1851, Text from RevoltLib.com, Transcription/Markup: Andy Carloff.
WE ARE BACK TO THE ESSENTIAL QUESTION, “How do you get your country back?”
The approach: To turn a dishonest man into an honest one. To turn Gen. Asim Munir true to his profession and country.
It can take more than a month to see a meaningful impact. Remember “sagacity and power” is the key to successful revolutions.
In Bolivia (2003) the people brought a peaceful siege (from “sagacity and power”) against the dictator. He fled the country. Start with a chant, “We The People” are behind Gen. Asim. The chant converts a dishonest man true to his country and profession.
In Bolvia, the concept of siege was expanded. These are men party to the Joint Criminal Enterprise and have committed crimes against humanity. This is called a peaceful revolution.
The high command has demonstrated they will revert to force (pick guns). The people will have to plan for consequences. This is the Chayes predicted aftermath of a revolution.
To STOP Bajwa’s ‘Reaction,’ you need “sagacity and power.”
Sagacious (having or showing keen mental discernment and good judgment.)
THE PEOPLE’S REVOLUTION
- Reaction makes a revolution grow
- Public security is your only law
- Give calls of distress. Lack of work, etc., etc. Flock the gates and streets with mass protest
I am, I am; I AM YOUR HONORARY COAS. Beholding to honor, one reacts, and you will surround your countrymen with humanity of decency and honor. Time for asking questions have run out.